> -----Original Message----- > From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net] > Sent: maandag 16 juli 2012 21:52 > To: Daniel Shahaf > Cc: Bert Huijben; 'Branko Čibej'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: RFC: Standardizing a 'svn:branch' (boolean) property > > On 07/16/2012 03:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Bert Huijben wrote on Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 19:51:59 +0200: > >> A simple question this 'might' help answer is: > >> > >> I have a project file ^/trunk/src/Ankh.Package/Ankh.Package.csproj, > which my user wants to check out. Which directory level should we suggest > the user checks out? > > > > The highest (closest-to-root) level that has svn:mergeinfo set. > > Huh? Most trunks won't have mergeinfo on them unless they've been the > recipient of a merge from elsewhere.
Just checking a few real world repositories and yes, trunk doesn't have svn:mergeinfo in my 'normal' usecases. And I think this would certainly apply to about every repository where one is experimenting with the tools to find out whether they want to use it or not. Bert