On 08/30/2012 10:45 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> 
> wrote:
>> Theoretically, though, it seems reasonable that my approach would have the
>> distinct non-feature of potentially having the client caching the properties
>> for an entire tree in memory, just waiting for a place to put them.
>
> It should not happen in current ra_serf editor implementation: parsing
> REPORT will be paused when active_fetchs + active_propfinds greater
> than 1000. See REQUEST_COUNT_TO_PAUSE/REQUEST_COUNT_TO_RESUME
> constants in libsvn_ra_serf/update.c

Excellent!  Thanks for pointing that out, Ivan.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to