Is it just a bug in the test script, whereby it uses the just-compiled svn instead of /usr/bin/svn?
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:32:03 -0400: > Aaaaand auto-upgrade strikes again. #hatethisnonfeature > > On 09/23/2012 08:33 PM, ne...@apache.org wrote: > > subversion/libsvn_wc/revision_status.c:64: (apr_err=155021) > > subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c:12198: (apr_err=155021) > > subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_wcroot.c:609: (apr_err=155021) > > subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_wcroot.c:266: (apr_err=155021) > > svn: E155021: This client is too old to work with the working copy at > > '/home/neels/pat/trunk/src' (format 30). > > You need to get a newer Subversion client. For more details, see > > http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#working-copy-format-change > > [...] > > -- > C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development >