Is it just a bug in the test script, whereby it uses the just-compiled
svn instead of /usr/bin/svn?

C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:32:03 -0400:
> Aaaaand auto-upgrade strikes again.  #hatethisnonfeature
> 
> On 09/23/2012 08:33 PM, ne...@apache.org wrote:
> > subversion/libsvn_wc/revision_status.c:64: (apr_err=155021)
> > subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c:12198: (apr_err=155021)
> > subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_wcroot.c:609: (apr_err=155021)
> > subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_wcroot.c:266: (apr_err=155021)
> > svn: E155021: This client is too old to work with the working copy at
> > '/home/neels/pat/trunk/src' (format 30).
> > You need to get a newer Subversion client. For more details, see
> >   http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#working-copy-format-change
> 
> [...]
> 
> -- 
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
> CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development
> 


Reply via email to