Daniel Shahaf wrote:

> Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 17:14:02 +0000:
>>  Prabhu Gnana Sundar <prabh...@collab.net> wrote:
>>  > +notify_verification_error(svn_revnum_t rev, svn_error_t *err,
>>  > +                          svn_repos_notify_func_t notify_func,
>>  > +                          void *notify_baton, apr_pool_t *pool)
> 
> Another thing I noticed is that this function re-allocates
> a notification object every time it's called.  I'm not sure, but it
> might be a good idea to rework it to allocate a single notification
> object per call to svn_repos_verify_fs3() (as the "Verified revision
> %ld." notification already does)?

That sounds like over-optimization to me, if your goal is to avoid a bit of 
run-time overhead each time we send a notification.  I can't imagine how that 
overhead could be significant.

However, if your goal is to be consistent with an existing notification 
function, then +1.

- Julian

Reply via email to