Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:37:19 +0100: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:42:29PM +0530, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote: > > I guess, this also solves the layer violation problem. Correct me if > > am wrong. > > Daniel suggested to use svn_error_quick_wrap() which you aren't using. > So I doubt you did what he had in mind. Honestly, I don't really understand > what he wants you to do either. Daniel, can you take the time to explain > a bit more clearly what you mean, please? >
If you wrap notify->err as follows: svn_error_quick_wrap(notify->err, _("Error verifying revision %ld:"))); then the output would be: * Verified revision 2. svnadmin: E160004: Error verifying revision %ld svnadmin: E160004: Missing node-id in node-rev at r3 (offset 787) Now, there are two details I haven't specified: - Passing the argument of the %ld printf format string. I'm pretty sure svn_error_quick_wrap doesn't take variadic printf arguments.. - Whether the wrapping happens in the caller or callee of the notify_func callback. Not hard, just need to ensure each error is cleared exactly once. I can argue either for this output or for the "* Error verified revision %ld" output Prabhu came up with; not sure yet which I prefer. Makes sense?