Ivan,

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts <l...@mobsol.be> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Philip Martin
> [...]
>
>> Also, there might well be a windows-kerberos triple trusted
>> domain .. setup somewhere where svn+neon works and svn+serf doesn't
>> work.
> What is "windows-kerberos tripli trusted domain" and what issues did
> you have with such configuration? Is this issue logged somewhere?
>
there is no such configuration, I used it to raise the question on
what a user can do if she has a svn setup that's not yet supported by
svn 1.8+serf.

> --
> Ivan Zhakov

Lieven

Reply via email to