On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:48:25PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Gabriela Gibson wrote on Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:40:42 +0000: > > in APR (look in 'apr/include/'):</p> > > > > <ul> > > -<li><p>memory pools: apr_pools.h</p></li> > > -<li><p>filesystem access: apr_file_io.h</p></li> > > -<li><p>hashes and arrays: apr_hash.h, apr_tables.h</p></li> > > +<li><p>memory pools: <a > > href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/include/apr_pools.h";>apr_pools.h</a></p></li> > > Broken links. If you want to link to them in APR's svn tree that's > fine, but I'm not sure whether you should link to the apr 1.x or 2.x > versions of these headers?
Daniel means this svn tree: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/ Which is where the APR project (http://apr.apache.org) has its source code. Just in case this wasn't clear. I'd say link to APR 1.5.x, which is the current release in the 1.x series: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/include/apr_pools.h It doesn't really matter if this link gets stale over time. Curious readers will find newer versions of the file on their own.
