On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: > I'm still not sure if the current scheme scales under the move of multiple > subtrees > > svn mv A Z > svn mv Z/B B > svn mv Z/C C > svn rm Z
You need --force here for 'svn rm Z' to work, and this results in the moves being lost: $ svn st D A D A/B D A/C A + B A + C $ Huh. Well, I'm sure you're pointing out real problems. However, you keep providing incomplete or non-obvious examples in your problem descriptions (like 'svn mv A B; svn mv B A' earlier, which also doesn't make sense). Please be more precise in explaining the problems you see. Otherwise it is difficult to have a productive discussion. I'd like to be able to properly reason about the issues you are raising but you aren't clearly enough communicating these problems for me to be able to digest them.
