On 01/28/2013 12:29 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:25:30 -0800:
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:59 AM, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> My only remaining minor nit is the variable name itself.  First, other
>>> variable names in this script use underscores to separate words:  for_repos,
>>> label_from, etc.  Secondly, it's really only the basename of the directory
>>> that's being substituted in, and I think the variable name should carry that
>>> information.  (I had to read your docs to make sure I wouldn't wind up with
>>> "[svn-/path/to/my/repository commit]".)  So, I'd suggest using
>>> "repos_basename" rather than "repodir".  Again, it's a minor thing -- and
>>> one that the patch applier can probably make on your behalf -- but if the
>>> name caused me some initial confusion, it'll probably do the same to someone
>>> else, too.
>>
>> I almost said something about the name too when I reviewed it.  I let
>> it go since you could easily say repodir means the name of the
>> directory that the repo is in.  I'd have gone with repos_name
>> personally.
>>
>> But at this point I feel like we're painting the bikeshed.
> 
> I'll commit with cmpilato's tweaks (indentation and varname) as I agree
> with them both.
> 

Cool.  Thanks, Daniel.

And thanks, Janos, for the contribution and patient survival of our
iterative patch review process. :-)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to