On 2013-02-28 08:37:51 -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > 3) You'd be saving storage at the expense of using time (read: CPU) on > every client that's working with those files when checking out. So > the end result may be worse than the current problem.
But storage is permanent, while a checkout may occur very rarely. Of course, the decompress/recompress solution should be a user choice because this may be bad in some cases, but it can also be very useful. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
