On 04/12/2013 12:27 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Prompted by Julian's review of this freshly-minted public API on IRC: > > 1. Question to API consumers (eg, client developers): would you find > this API useful? For reference, the current docstring is attached.
N/A > 2. Should we print the symbolic name in release builds? No! Very low signal-to-noise ratio change, that. (And in the cases where it's *not*, then I submit it's our error strings themselves that need to be fixed!) > 3. Should the API return the error code, or the error code without the > "SVN_ERR_" prefix? It should return the full error code, allowing this function to -- perhaps someday -- accurately identify APR_* or SERF_* error codes without needing to add an additional return parameter to identify the namespace of the symbolic name. -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
