On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 07:07:10PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > I was hoping someone else would weigh in here. But I guess not. > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You guys are over-thinking it. Simply state this format is ASF-wide > > and be done with it. > > Okay but should we ask anyone before we go and start using something > like application/vnd.apache.pubsub+json? Daniel seemed to think we > shouldn't use the apache namespace without talking to operations.
To clarify: the point here isn't to add red tape; the point is not to stomp on a shared namespace. In "vnd.apache.pubsub", "Apache Pubsub" is neither a PMC nor a product. If any PMC registers arbitrary unix names of things in a shared namespace, the result would be confusing. Anyway, wrt concerns raised so far, I'll mention a few more permutations: application/vnd.svn-pubsub+json application/vnd.pubsub-stream+json application/vnd.svn-pubsub-stream+json
