On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > I just noticed the "Working copy records moves as first-class operation" > section in the release notes may not be clear enough, as it doesn't > explicitly point out that the local move is NOT preserved as a move when > committed. I feel some readers will optimistically assume it means more than > it does, and then be disappointed. (Remember that some users have a much > fuzzier notion of terms such as "working copy" than we do.) > > > Suggested patch:
[...] > Good to commit? > > - Julian Yes, please! I agree completely. Thanks!
