Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes:
> Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes:
>
>> I can't see any way to do the 9-node change without using temporaries.
>
> I think we can reduce the 9 nodes to 6 and still see the problem:
Even 3 nodes is a problem. Start with A, A/B and A/B/C and swap A and
A/B/C. There are two ways user can do this:
svn mv A <tmp>
svn mv <tmp>/B/C A
svn mv <tmp>/B A/B
svn mv <tmp> A/B/C
or
svn mv A/B/C <tmp>
svn mv A/B <tmp>/B
svn mv A <tmp>/B/C
svn mv <tmp> A
and the commit looks like:
r2 | pm | 2013-06-27 09:51:56 +0100 (Thu, 27 Jun 2013)
Changed paths:
R /A (from /A/B/C:1)
A /A/B (from /A/B:1)
R /A/B/C (from /A:1)
D /A/B/C/B
I don't see how Ev2 represents this. If we do rotate(A,A/B/C) that
leaves just one other node A/B. When/where does Ev2 move it? If we
look at how the user did it then we see the move of A/B happens in the
middle of the rotate and not before or after.
--
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco | Non-Stop Data
www.wandisco.com
