> -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org] > Sent: dinsdag 9 juli 2013 09:46 > To: Greg Stein > Cc: kmradke; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1495419 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf: options.c ra_serf.h serf.c util.c > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For *this* project, that is absolutely the case. We have never said "let's > > work against any server anybody decides to implement." We write to our > > client, and our server, and third parties adapt to our changes. > > But we have said that a newer Subversion client will continue to work > against an older server. The net effect of this issue is hardly > different for users trapped behind these proxies from us requiring > some new feature only provided in a 1.8 server to use a 1.8 client. I > realize that's not entirely true since our server has always supported > chunked requests, but I don't think users see this distinction. I > think we owe our users to go the extra mile here.
Note that we haven't got a single report from a user with a proxy that behaves like this. All user reports on our lists (and to the AnkhSVN lists) are against servers that are setup with a front-end-proxy to the internet. Normal users wouldn't even see this as a proxy setup. I wouldn't be surprised if most of these are already upgraded, as that is the most likely reason why we don't get additional user reports on our lists. Bert