On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Philip Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Greg Stein <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Philip Martin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>... >>> again either invalid or switched. This implies that if we want to >>> combine >> >> They are already combined. One person is trying to *decombine* them >> into separate non-atomic unknown-duration actions. > > Two people at least. I have shown how Ev2 with a split move could > handle the case > > A/B/C to A > A/B to A/B > A to A/B/C > > What is your alternative?
move(A/B/C@original, A, replace=R) move(A/B@original, A/B) move(A@original, A/B/C) Not sure of the intent with children (ie. what is retained under A/B/C). Cheers, -g
