On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100 > "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > > > I think the dll load function should be converted to a more stable > > pattern, that properly handles multiple threads. And perhaps we > > should just assume a few more NT functions to be alsways there > > instead of loading them dynamically. > > This is possible with the 'mandatory' call to apr_init, but I think the > existing pattern should persist for those who don't like to call the > initialization logic. > We currently call apr_initialize() before spawning threads or doing anything other APR. What else do we need to become thread-safe under Windows? -- Stefan^2.
