Martin Furter <[email protected]> writes:

> I could also argue that it is inconsistent as long as you do not write
> *c as *(c+0).
>
> But this is irrelevant. As you found out the log message is wrong. So
> here is a honest one:
>
> [[[
> What led to at least one bug will probably lead to more bugs so remove
> the ugliness from the code to reduce the possibility of future bugs of
> this kind.
>
> ...
> ]]]

It's a style issue.  I'm happy for you to change svn_path_splitext but
don't think we should change all the places you are proposing to change.

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*

Reply via email to