Sergey Raevskiy <sergey.raevs...@visualsvn.com> writes: > What actually happens here: Excel tries to refresh existing lock using > an "If" header (see section 7.8 of RFC 2518 [1]). The supplied lock > token is valid but server responds with '412 Precondition Failed' > instead of '200 OK'. Excel tries to obtain a new lock on opened file, > but request expectedly fails.
I see the same problem with LibreOffice on Linux. > After some digging, I found out that correct behaviour was broken in > r859583 [2] > when fixing issue 2275 [3]. > +@XFail() > +@SkipUnless(svntest.main.is_ra_type_dav) > +def dav_lock_refresh(sbox): > + "refresh timeout of DAV lock" > + > + # Around trunk@1581815 refreshing of DAV lock fails with error > + # '412 Precondition Failed' You say it starts to fail at r859583 so how is 1581815 relevant? -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
