On 17.05.2014 13:12, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:10:32AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: >> ... we really don't want to have backend-specific commands in svnadmin. > Why not? Anyway, you're a bit late with this demand. > There are svnadmin list-dblogs and list-unused-dblogs (BDB-only), > there is hotcopy --incremental which only works on FSFS, some > subcommands take a --memory-cache-size option which is FSFS-specific. > I didn't look for more examples.
Yes, I know about that. So much for consistency. :) > I think it's better to keep admin-facing user interfaces focused > on the existing admin tools. In my experience, even experienced > admins often don't know off-hand whether to use svnadmin or svnlook. > > Why should people suddenly care about the backend a repository is > using if they just want to see some repository filesystem stats? > > Also, stuff in tools/ is often not packaged by packagers, and ends > up missing on most installations even though it would be useful. > > svn-bench is another such example. We should just move this into > 'svn' as far as I'm concerned. Eh? Benchmarking in the client? Now that would really be confusing. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
