Alexey Neyman <sti...@att.net> writes: > PS. I use svn_ra_session_t as an example where a semi-permanent > allocation is necessary. However, I couldn't find the interface > that destroys/closes the svn_ra_session_t. Is it correct that the > svn_ra_session_t is always destroyed by destroying the corresponding > session pool?
Yes, and that a pattern is also used in other places, e.g. svn_fs_t. -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
