Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> [...] should preserve the exact textual form of the {DATE} spec. I'm not
>> sure if it currently does.
>
> That has been fixed in r1655872. The date string is preserved now.
Not in that commit, but it does look like it's been fixed in a later commit,
but there doesn't seem to be a test for it.
> BTW, I don't know why the Z was in the generated date string but
> I don't think its intended meaning is "Zulu time". It's part of
> a static string in our own code (libsvn_subr/time.c):
>
> #define TIMESTAMP_FORMAT "%04d-%02d-%02dT%02d:%02d:%02d.%06dZ"
The 'Z' defined there certainly does mean 'Zulu' (that is, UTC) time.
- Julian
