Sergey Raevskiy <sergey.raevs...@visualsvn.com> writes: > Yes, the behaviour is *not* exactly the same -- the index files is updated in > different order. Furthermore, I've realized that current version of algorithm > will set some locks even if update of some index files is failed.
I think that is OK. What matters is that the lock database remains valid when writes fail: i.e. lock files never exist without all the index entries. Committed in r1659212. Thanks! -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
