On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 20:31, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] > >> Sent: maandag 11 mei 2015 12:31 > >> To: Subversion Development > >> Subject: Getting ready for RC2 (was: Apache Subversion 1.9.0-rc1 > released) > >> > >> Now that this is out of the way, I propose we start rolling > >> RC2 immediately. A number of critical changes have already been > >> backported to 1.9.x, and a few are still waiting in STATUS. > >> > >> Our pre-release soak period starts today. Currently I see nothing > >> slated for RC2 that would require a restart of the soak, only the > >> standard 1-week extension. Assuming we get RC2 out the door in > >> the next 2-3 weeks and don't find anything horrible in the code > >> during the soak, we can tentatively expect to release 1.9.0 > >> on 15th June. > > > > With the key matching patch approved are there any more open issues left > now, or can we roll rc2? > > > I'm not aware of rc2 blocker issues, but I think it would be nice to > have r1680819 (possible revprop change corruption during power loss) > released as part of 1.9.0. It's not regression from 1.8.x, but could > be if we release 1.8.14 before 1.9.0. > That change is now approved for both 1.8.x and 1.9.x. -- Stefan^2.