On 13.07.2015 11:20, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:07:57AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 13.07.2015 11:04, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Author: jorton
>>> Date: Mon Jul 13 09:04:13 2015
>>> New Revision: 1690591
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1690591
>>> Log:
>>> * subversion/bindings/swig/include/proxy.swg:
>>> Use %{ %} with %pythoncode so comments avoid the SWIG preprocessor,
>>> fixing the bindings with SWIG 3.0.6.
> ...
>> I've tried this before and it didn't fix the bindings at all.
> Hi Brane - yes I know, note the comment on the version: the SWIG
> developers have addressed the issues we were hitting in the new 3.0.6
> release last week.
Ah, I must've been using a pre-release of 3.0.6. I'll certainly retest.
I agree with using %{ %} fwiw; it just didn't help last time I did that.
-- Brane
