On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 July 2015 at 00:15, Stefan Fuhrmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> The 1.8.14 release artefacts are now available for testing/signing. > >> > >> Please get the tarballs from > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/ > >> > >> and add your signatures there. > >> > >> Thanks! > > > > > > Summary: > > > > +1 to release > > > [...] > > > > > Results: > > > > (Not a regression) The text delta code for old-style deltas segfaults > > when compiled with GCC 4.9 and -O3, e.g. with > > --disable-debug --enable-optimize. This failes > > lt-random-test 2: random combine delta test > > 1.9 does not have that problem and a fix has been > > proposed for backport. > > > Should we consider this problem as a blocker for the release? > > I agree that this is not a regression, but is it OK to make a release > that does not build properly with the *actual* compiler? > To clarify: This behavior is new in GCC 4.9.2 and did not occur with GCC 4.8.2. It may or may not work with 5.1. -- Stefan^2.
