> -----Original Message-----
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: maandag 17 augustus 2015 11:44
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1696225 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> libsvn_subr/stream.c tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c
>
> On 17.08.2015 11:40, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: rhuijben
> > Date: Mon Aug 17 09:40:04 2015
> > New Revision: 1696225
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1696225
> > Log:
> > Following up on r1696222, implement polling on pipes on Windows.
> >
> > Note that PeekNamedPipe() also works on unnamed pipes, such as those
> created
> > by apr to hook stdin and stdout of subprocesses.
> >
> > * subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c
> > (data_available_handler_apr): Implement polling on pipes for Win32.
> >
> > * subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c
> > (test_funcs): Remove Windows specific XFail marking.
> >
> > Modified:
> > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c
> > subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c
> >
> > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.
> c?rev=1696225&r1=1696224&r2=1696225&view=diff
> >
> ================================================================
> ==============
> > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c (original)
> > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c Mon Aug 17 09:40:04
> 2015
> > @@ -942,8 +942,9 @@ static svn_error_t *
> > data_available_handler_apr(void *baton, svn_boolean_t *data_available)
> > {
> > struct baton_apr *btn = baton;
> > - apr_pollfd_t pfd;
> > apr_status_t status;
> > +#if !defined(WIN32) || APR_FILES_AS_SOCKETS
> > + apr_pollfd_t pfd;
> > int n;
> >
> > pfd.desc_type = APR_POLL_FILE;
> > @@ -973,6 +974,24 @@ data_available_handler_apr(void *baton,
> > "failed")),
> > NULL);
> > }
> > +#else
> > + HANDLE h;
> > + DWORD dwAvail;
> > + status = apr_os_file_get(&h, btn->file);
> > +
> > + if (status)
> > + return svn_error_wrap_apr(status, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (PeekNamedPipe(h, NULL, 0, NULL, &dwAvail, NULL))
> > + {
> > + *data_available = (dwAvail > 0);
> > + return SVN_NO_ERROR;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_STREAM_NOT_SUPPORTED,
> > + svn_error_wrap_apr(apr_get_os_error(), NULL),
> > + _("Windows doesn't support polling on files"));
> > +#endif
> > }
>
> Interesting solution ... should be in APR, I guess? I'm wondering it's
> really safe to expect that the socked we got from APR is really an
> (un)named pipe?
The only other case would be a normal file, which would just return an error.
Apr should be able to tell the difference between pipes and files for the
handles it created itself... Working on a patch for apr now.
(I think it is possible to ask apr to wrap an existing os handle...)
Bert
