Stefan Sperling <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:38:54PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: >> I don't think this is allowed.
Ah yes, 7.13.2.1/2 agrees. > Isn't the right fix to mark the affected variables as volatile? It is slightly more involved because one variable is a parameter, 1728464. -- Philip Martin WANdisco
