On 6/23/2016 00:33, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Hett <ste...@egosoft.com> wrote: >> On 6/22/2016 1:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: >>> >>>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> 2) Remove some questions that are unlikely to be relevant / >>>> interesting anymore (e.g. "How is Subversion affected by the 2007 >>>> changes in Daylight Savings Time (DST)?") >> For outdated information: Fully agree. >> For BDB-related information, I would not yet call it outdated though. At >> least not before BDB support is dropped from SVN completely (and then >> (re-)move that information at the same time when the old-stable version no >> longer supports it), since it's still applicable to the current supported >> version. > Hm, I'd say we move BDB-questions to the deprecated section in the > FAQ, since it's been deprecated since 1.8 [1], which is our old stable > version. I'm not talking about removing information, but let's move > them to the deprecated section. +1 (non-binding) from my side :-) > [1] http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#bdb-deprecated
Regards, Stefan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
