On 25.10.2016 19:50, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 19:44:28 +0200: >> If we do this, I'd argue for making the files ASCII-armored PGP, not >> keeping signatures separate. > Inline PGP has a problem with lines that start with a hyphen, which > occur in patches. > > I think our options are: > > - Use detached signatures
You just convinced me ... > - Indent the patches one space > - Tell gpg(1) not to escape minuses on the first column > - Okay if people use gpg(1) > - Breaks compatibility with other PGP implementations > - Do nothing > - Okay if people use GNU patch > - Not okay if people use 'svn patch' or a third-party patch(1) > implementation
