No patch releases though, right? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/CHANGES
Is that because, "the server can store the offending PDFs" isn't enough of a releasable in its own right? Or because the "the server can store the offending PDFs" specifically is imperfect and unreleasable in some way? - Paul On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:30:57AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > > Hi, devs. Re. the SHA-1 fixes contemplated or in-the-works for SVN 1.8 > and > > 1.9: Any idea on how those are coming along and when they might see the > > light of day (in patch releases)? > > > > - Julian > > > > As far as I can tell, these changes touch FSFS only. So while the server > can now store the offending PDF files, nothing has been done yet regarding > other areas which have problems with these files such as the working copy > (pristine store) and ra_serf (avoids fetching files already stored in > pristine store). > > And perhaps there are more areas which have problems? I am not aware > of any effort to figure that out. >