On 01.09.2017 13:30, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:36:46AM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Because I think that strict glob-like patterns need to be supported
as well, I suggest to have two options:

    --search does a fuzzy search just like we use it in other commands.
             We implicitly add leading an trailing '*'.

    --search-glob performs a fully case- and accent-sensitive glob
                  matching.

As with '--search' alone, the user is free to specify any number
and combination of the above but without the support of '--search-and' -
at least for now.

Thoughts? Better names for '--search-glob'?

I don't see a need to invent a new option name.

I would say it's OK to have --search options with slightly different
semantics for different subcommands. Their semantics just shouldn't
be entirely different. If one matches case-sensitively and the other
does not, I would say that's too different. But I don't think we
need to be consistent about implicit *-globbing rules.

So having 'svn list --search' do what you describe above as
'svn list --search-glob' would be entirely acceptable to me.

Yeah, my impression is that most people don't see a need
for an exact matching option.  And given that the "fuzzy"
matching will rarely produce false negatives, users could
easily post-filter the results if they want to remove
false positives.

That would leave us with 'svn ls --search' working almost
exactly like 'svn list --search', except that we must not
add implicit '*' globs on both sides of the pattern.  If
we did that "*.c" would match "hallo.cpp", and that would
be confusing to most users.

So, if there are no strong opinions against it, I will undo
the "--pattern" option commit and change the matching code
to case- and accent-insensitive.

-- Stefan^2.

Reply via email to