Julian Foad wrote on Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:27:21 +0100: > Julian Foad wrote on 2018-05-20: > > I suggest our next step should be updating the Subversion web pages to > > state (clearly) this new policy. We should not yet delete the statements > > about the old policy. > > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to do that? If not, I will. > > Done in http://svn.apache.org/r1834111, > "Publish our new 6-month standard and 2-year LTS release schedule." >
Thanks for documenting this! In practical terms, we have now promised to release 1.11.0 around October, so we should start thinking of cutting a 1.11.x stabilization branch around late August / early September. The new documentation states that 1.9 would be an LTS release, to be supported until 1.14; I had assumed 1.10 would be an LTS release (supported until 1.14 is released + overlap period) but 1.9 would be a "normal" release, to be supported until 1.11 is released. That would be consistent both with the guarantees made when 1.9 was released and with the new "1.x is LTS if (x%4 == 2)" practice. Cheers, Daniel > http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html > http://subversion.apache.org/news.html#news-20180622 > > - Julian
