On 16.07.2018 21:46, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > (why would CHANGES in a 1.9.x tarball need to contain changes of the > 1.8 line?)
Because I, as an admin, want to see the whole relevant history in CHANGES when something breaks and I have to fix it.
On 16.07.2018 21:46, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > (why would CHANGES in a 1.9.x tarball need to contain changes of the > 1.8 line?)
Because I, as an admin, want to see the whole relevant history in CHANGES when something breaks and I have to fix it.