On 21.08.2018 18:13, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Julian Foad wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:27 +0100: >> Agreed. Also we might like to teach "svnadmin verify" to check whether >> the cache is complete. >> > Well, a missing 'rep-cache' is not a correctness problem, but merely an > efficiency problem (which the admin may have explicitly opted into), so > I'm not sure 'verify' would be the best place for it --- but we can figure > that out if and when. I agree such functionality would be useful.
Given that the rep-cache is extremely specific to FSFS, 'svnfsfs' looks like the right tool to manipulate it. I'd hesitate to put such backend-specific functionality into svnadmin. -- Brane
