On 14.10.2018 15:48, Nikita Slyusarev wrote: > > 04.08.2018, 17:47, "Nikita Slyusarev" <ns...@yandex-team.com>: >> >> For everyone's sanity I'd better not only bump the thread, but also >> resend the patch and the log message I had prepared back then. >> >> 14.07.2018, 19:04, "Nikita Slyusarev" <ns...@yandex-team.com >> <mailto:ns...@yandex-team.com>>: >> >> >> >> [[[ >> Correctly handle existing parent directories when performing >> repos-to-wc copy. >> >> * subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c >> (repos_to_wc_copy): If add_parents flag is set and destination >> parent >> directory exists, but is unversioned, put it under version >> control. Wc-to-wc >> copy behaves this way, and so should repos-to-wc copy do. >> >> * subversion/tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py >> (copy_make_parents_repo_wc, >> copy_make_parents_wc_wc): Check behaviour with dst directory >> pre-creation >> for both repo-to-wc and wc-to-wc test cases. >> ]]] >> >> > > > Hello, guys, any hope to get this reviewed?
Hey. Thanks for the nudge. I have just one comment: The two new test scenarios you should be split into their own test cases. Not only is it bad practice to make a test case test more than one scenario, it also defeats parallel test execution. -- Brane