Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: > > I'm glad you included a FS-level test for it. In case anyone is > > interested, I attach a patch that backports the initial RA-level test to > > 1.8. 1.9 and 1.10. > > Any reason not to commit that one, too?
Personally, I think that having another test on the RA layer for this case is unnecessary and would just increase the maintenance costs — since this is an FS layer bug and given that we already have the (more or less) minimal regression test in terms of the amount of the FS API calls. Regards, Evgeny Kotkov
