On 22.01.2019 23:10, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 22.01.2019 22:52, Branko Čibej wrote: >> [Moving to the correct list.] >> >> On 22.01.2019 22:18, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> in Gentoo Linux, wc-queries-test test is failing (verified >>> against v1.9.7-1.11.1: >>> [...] >>>> svn_tests: E200006: STMT_DROP_TARGETS_LIST: Uses sqlite_master with only 0 >>>> index component: ((null)) >>>> DROP TABLE targets_list >>>> svn_tests: E200042: Additional errors: >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> svn_tests: E200035: |SCAN TABLE sqlite_master >>>> FAIL: wc-queries-test 3: test query expectations >>>> PASS: wc-queries-test 4: test query duplicates >>>> PASS: wc-queries-test 5: test schema statistics >>>> PASS: wc-queries-test 6: verify queries are parsable >>>> END: wc-queries-test >>>> ELAPSED: wc-queries-test 0:00:00.167083 >>> After some research we found the problem causing the test failure: >>> >>> In Gentoo we are building sqlite with >>> >>>> -DSQLITE_ENABLE_STMT_SCANSTATUS >>> option set. If we disable that option, the test is passing. >>> >>> Downstream-bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/605438 > > I've filed this as issue #4804, it looks like a bug in our tests.
I was able to reproduce this with the latest (amalgamated) SQLite on macOS — so, not using get-deps.sh, as the version that downloads is too old. I've written up my analysis in issue #4804; the short story is that adding the compile-time option mentioned above adds output to 'EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN' that our test doesn't like. Bert, you wrote most of this query test code; would you mind taking a look at this issue? -- Brane
