Branko Čibej wrote on 2019-04-09: > Is there a reason why this would be hidden away in 'svnfsfs' instead of > 'svnadmin'? Other than that the latter would have to return 'something' > for BDB repositories.
I am wondering the same. We've deprecated BDB support so I think we don't need to implement it for BDB even if the API/CLI is exposed generally, e.g. in svnadmin. So that's probably the better place. Similar consideration applies to the API. I think this could be a libsvn_fs API rather than only in libsvn_fs_fs. Agreed? -- - Julian
