On 28.06.2019 19:12, Thomas Singer wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> Thanks for your explanation. This sounds quite interesting. I have
> some questions though:
>
> - so the working copy can have checked out multiple commits or one
> checkpoint?
>
> - will it support multiple histories ("branches") planned, e.g. for
> different features?
>
> - will it support "rebasing" such a local history onto the latest
> updated commit?
>As Mark explained, it will do none of the above unless someone steps up and writes the code. For reference, what Nathan described was discussed here on the list and in person during hackathons years ago, yet nothing happened until Julian started writing code (and even then, what Julian is doing is a limited subset of the "ideal"). If there's no interest amongst people to take the time to write the code ... well, we can all tell tall stories about the future, but that won't change it one bit. -- Brane
