Thomas Singer wrote: >> Probably the thing that would help me the most would be if >> the releases slowed down. If we want them on a schedule then do it >every 12 >> months instead of 6. > >+1
But... we are doing releases on a 24-month schedule. We are calling those "LTS" releases. They correspond in purpose and stability and frequency to the old minor releases. What is compelling you to do anything with the new "regular" 6-month releases in between LTS releases? Or did we not communicate sufficiently about the new release schedule? - Julian
