Most buildsystems on Windows assumed just Win32 and the usual win64-x64, and ARM64 is a different beast... An on top of that you usually cross compile.
But I got confirmation that the binaries work great on these systems... It got through all the python+c tests except the 2 or 3 common failures we also see when setting up new bots. Bert Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 7:50:13 PM To: Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org <dev@subversion.apache.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1890223 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svn_private_config.hw b...@qqmail.nl wrote on Thu, 27 May 2021 11:51 +00:00: > We will need a few more patches to really support ARM64 builds. Once I > get things working I’ll add a pull request. Neither backport.pl nor backport.py support pull requests, so the RM would have to merge it manually. > Most likely I will release a SlikSvn client release for ARM64 with that > support if everything comes together… But cross compiling on Windows is > quite new for most of our dependencies, and ARM64 is new as well so > most dependencies need patches (except for those building via CMake) Is the relation between not needing patches and using CMake merely correlation or also causation? Cheers, Daniel
