Marl Phippard wrote: > Yes, and I agree --quiet should suppress. [...TSVN] hooked into our > notifications to be providing an update on bytes transferred. [...] I > just assumed they would work ... maybe they still do?
Daniel Sahlberg wrote: >> Yes, I like this very much. The more feedback [...] the less >> risk/chance of users believing something is wrong. --quiet also seems >> like a good idea, then powerusers can limit the amount of feedback. OK, seems I should proceed. Thanks for the comments. >> I'm primarily using TortoiseSVN and I can confirm that it is >> displaying the number of bytes trasfered, but I havn't digged through >> the code to find where these notifications come from. Daniel, can you confirm if you mean you are using a 1.14-based TSVN, on a 1.15 working copy, and it is showing bytes-transferred feedback during the hydrating? I had assumed it would need to be rebuilt and modified to do that. If that part Just Works already, that's great news. >> I would want to see the "hydrating" message also in TSVN, but I >> assume it would not be too difficult to hook into these notifications >> (if they are indeed a different kind). Certainly TSVN would need a small update to make it display the new notifications (hydrating start, hydrating file, hydrating end). - Julian
