On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:20 AM Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone with experience in the bindings have time to look at the backport > of r1897441 (in 1.14.x/STATUS)? It was nominated by jun66j5, however it > doesn't apply cleanly. I think it would work if at least r1885008 is added to > the group, but probably also r1886858 and r1886872. > > It would be good to have it merged if it increases test coverage. > > Kind regards, > Daniel
Sorry, I noticed that the nomination r1897441 is not needed for 1.14.x. Removed it from STATUS file. However, I get 2 failures from 1.14.x/win-tests.py on Windows (tests for swig-py, swig-pl and javahl pass). FAIL: mod_authz_svn_tests.py 10: repos-relative access file FAIL: mod_authz_svn_tests.py 11: repos-relative access file with bad repository URL It seems to be necessary to merge r1884474 to fix. -- Jun Omae <jun6...@gmail.com> (大前 潤)
dav-fails.log
Description: Binary data
