Den lör 9 maj 2026 kl 19:03 skrev Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]>:
>
> On Sat, 9 May 2026 at 13:51, Daniel Sahlberg <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Den fre 8 maj 2026 kl 21:24 skrev Daniel Sahlberg 
>> <[email protected]>:
>> >
>> > Crossposting between dev@subversion and dev@serf: This is an error in
>> > Subversion's GHA build but it is caused by an issue in Serf's build
>> > system.
>> >
>> > Den fre 8 maj 2026 kl 20:11 skrev GitBox <[email protected]>:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The GitHub Actions job "CMake" on subversion.git/trunk has failed.
>> > > Run started by GitHub user asf-gitbox-commits (triggered by 
>> > > asf-gitbox-commits).
>> > >
>> > > Head commit for run:
>> > > 33480bcd3d11768caa4fd801fc00a845c1bf607b / Daniel Sahlberg 
>> > > <[email protected]>
>> > > * .github/workflows/cmake.yml: Attempt to fix Window build on GitHub 
>> > > Actions.
>> > >
>> > > Shamelessly borrowed from r1933912 in APR (by Ivan)
>> > >
>> > > git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk@1933957 
>> > > 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>> > >
>> > > Report URL: https://github.com/apache/subversion/actions/runs/25571122451
>> > >
>> > > With regards,
>> > > GitHub Actions via GitBox
>> > >
>> >
>> > Copying from the GHA log:
>> >
>> > [[[
>> > scons-dbg-err.log
>> > scons: *** Invalid value for enum variable 'MSVC_VERSION': '14.5'.
>> > Valid values are: ('14.3', '14.2', '14.1', '14.0', '12.0', '11.0',
>> > '10.0', '9.0', '8.0', '6.0')
>> > File "C:\vcpkg\buildtrees\serf\src\serf-1-659141d597.clean\SConstruct",
>> > line 164, in <module>
>> > Completed submission of openssl:[email protected] to 1
>> > binary cache(s) in 8.7 s
>> > Completed submission of zlib:[email protected] to 1 binary
>> > cache(s) in 119 ms
>> > Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
>> > ]]]
>> >
>> > This is fixed in Serf/trunk in r1933327. I've nominated this as a
>> > backport to 1.3.x in r1933963 but we obviously need to make a new
>> > release of Serf to resolve it.
>> >
>> > I don't know if Subversion can patch the vcpkg package or if it is
>> > possible to patch the vcpkg package itself.
>>
>> I took a look at the vcpkg package and there is already another patch
>> so I followed that model and created a PR:
>> https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/pull/51629
>>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Yes, patches is typical thing for vcpkg packages.
>
> Minor comments regarding PR:
> 1. As far as I know port-version in vcpkg.json should be incremented if port 
> changed without changing version field.
>
> 2. I suggest to rename vs_2026.diff to something like serf-r1933327.diff.
>
> Besides of that PR looks good to me.

Thank you, appreciate your review! I've closed the PR and will update
as suggested.

Cheers,
Daniel

Reply via email to