Den sön 26 juli 2026 kl 12:06 skrev Jun Omae <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 6:39 PM Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On 26. 7. 2026 11:24, Jun Omae wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that svn-javahl.jar file has class files for unit tests while
> working for support build JavaHL with cmake.
> > I don't think it's necessary for the jar file for distribution.... is
> that intentional?
> >
> >
> >
> > I noticed this myself the last time I looked at JavaHL. I'm not sure how
> this came about in the first place, but by now it's intentional because
> it's always been this way. Maybe it's to allow users who only use binaries
> to run JavaHL tests. In any case this is part of the published ABI.
>
>
> In JavaDoc for JavaHL, test classes are not described.
> See https://subversion.apache.org/docs/javahl/1.14/
>
>
> > In JavaHL build with cmake, the class files for unit tests are archived
> into svn-javahl-tests.jar, and only svn-javahl.jar is installed.
> >
> >
> > The CMake build must create a JAR that is identical to what the
> autotools produce.
>
>
> JUnit jar is not required for build with autoconf. Without JUnit jar,
> the svn-javahl.jar doesn't have test classes.
>
How did you configure your build?
If I configure with --with-junit=/path/to/junit-4.13.2.jar, I can run `make
install-javahl` successfully.
However if I configure without --with-junit (and run make clean!), I get
error messages whenever I run `make install-javahl`:
[[[
/home/dsg/ramdisk/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/tests/org/apache/subversion/javahl/BasicTests.java:1446:
error: cannot find symbol
assertEquals(expected, actual);
^
symbol: method assertEquals(String,String)
location: class BasicTests
]]]
What I'd like to confirm is if we can create a JAR without the test classes.
@Jun Omae <[email protected]> Is there a problem if we include the test
classes?
Cheers,
Daniel
