Other than ad hominems, do you have any evidence that my statement regarding the amount of non-dwm related traffic in the dwm@ list is untrue?
Thank you uriel On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, pmarin <[email protected]> wrote: > Uriel this is not 9fans, please send your stupid commets to another list. > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uriel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Stop whining, the dwm list had tons of non-dwm chatter, if you are not >> interested in one thread, press the delete button. >> >> uriel >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Conner <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list? >>> >>> That's a great idea! >>> >>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > I'd like to know this too. I would only like dwm ones like the lists >>>> > used >>>> > to be. >>>> > >>>> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I >>>> >> get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all. >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
