Somebody thought breaking gnome was a problem rather than a feature, my comment was *not* universally redundant.
Remember that suckless now seems to be full of people that think HTML is a good typesetting system. uriel On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:44 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > * Kris Maglione <[email protected]> [2009-09-19 19:20]: >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:31:04PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: >>> Uriel dixit (2009-09-19, 14:19): >>> >>>> "broken gnome" is redundant. >>> >>> This comment was also redudant. Everyone knows you think that, so your >>> comment was implicit, everyone knew it before you actually sent it out, >>> by way of which the above is redundant. :) >> >> One should think the comment would be redundant for any person on this >> list. > > The whole above branch of the thread is redundant, since everyone on the > list knew that uriel will make the comment, and that someone will respond > as above. Now, I sacrifice myself to be the one to -- redundantly -- > summarise, and make the redundancy complete. > > Or not? You never know ... > > -- > cheers > stanio_ > >
