[2009-10-06 21:26] Antoni Grzymala <ant...@chopin.edu.pl> > markus schnalke dixit (2009-10-06, 20:54): > > > > I switched to nmh just these days and I'm greatly impressed. It gives this > > feeling that you know from using Unix. But you need to do a lot of stuff by > > hand. (OTOH you can!) > > /me envies somewhat. Been planning to take the plunge and switch over > from mutt, but there's just too much in my config file that I depend on > and won't have time of reworking in mh in foreseeable future.
Don't depend so much on your personalized stuff. Just switch! ;-) I had this plan for quite a long time and always pushed it forward but did not switch. Now a nice guy gave me a hit on the topic, and finally I just did it. (In less than a week.) It wasn't such a big thing, acutally, cause I already used the MH mailbox format. Hence I still can use mutt in parallel, if necessary. > > Mounting remote mail boxes into your local file system seems to be the right > > thing. Then there is no local--remote difference. (This kind of thinking is > > what I learned from Plan9.) > > That's another solution. However this would require a good filesystem > with local caching and graceful disconnection handling. I think syncing > over SSH is at the moment simpler and good enough. I prefer to work remotely to avoid all that stuff. But this requires an own server of course. Syncing file systems is a problem if you want to use mail servers that don't belong to you (e.g. free mailers). I think this was the setup of interest: Several computers and a free mail account. meillo