On 4/11/10, markus schnalke <[email protected]> wrote: > Now I actually must assume, Uriel might be wrong. *eek* > > But is this possible?
yes
- [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q markus schnalke
- Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q Szabolcs Nagy
- Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q Jonas Domeij
- Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q anonymous
- Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q Uriel
- Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q Szabolcs Nagy
- Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q hiro
- Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q markus schnalke
